>>>>>>>I am not going to reply to the change of subject to Obama. Especially not a link to Fox News.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It is interesting. You postured countless number of times how every media source should be taken into account, but, when confronted with the only major one that does not fit to your political belief, you just brush it out.
>>>>>
>>>>>Treating Fox as if it were a news source is pure propaganda.
>>>>
>>>>Without Fox News, US media would be, in terms of press freedom, somewhere between Zimbabwe and Zanzibar.
>>>>Please, be advised, that I don't care what kind of opinion you may have on this topic.
>>>
>>>This from a guy who cut his teeth on Pravda?! Good grief. You are as far off the deep end as John H. at the moment.
>>
>>Are you sober enough to accept a reply?
>
>I am completely sober. Not only that, attending meetings every day to try and stay that way. But you don't need to reply. We really have nothing to discuss on this topic if you think Fox News is the only worthwhile U.S. news organization. I remain happy to discuss other topics with you, and enjoy your posts. Well, other than this one ;-)

It is good that you are completely sober. It makes my task easier, and reply is definitely required.
I am not aware what kind of relationship you have with John H. or John K, etc. Maybe they are your old friends and it is permissible in your narrow circle trading jabs. However, I am not your friend, and I am not looking to become one, therefore certain casual expressions can be easily perceived as personal insults. I don't think you would appreciate if I reply in kind, especially because your way of talking too much and exposing intimate details of your private life could subject you to very rude handling.