>>>>I think there are two separate issues. I agree with you that the Democrats are recruiting voters who would be unlikely to vote otherwise, and that it isn't necessarily an expression of the will of the people. (Stop the presses! -- I criticized the Democrats). But I think voter suppression is a very real issue, and we know which party is doing that. The Republicans have very specific, very targeted strategies for minimizing turnout in some areas. Fortunately, it isn't going to be enough to save them this time (evil cackle). >>> >>>They do? What strategies are the Republicans employing? >>> >>>You mean like slashing car tires. >>>http://www.courttv.com/news/2005/0124/tireslash_ap.html >>>http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=418855 >>>http://www.courttv.com/trials/omokunde/background_ctv.html >>>http://www.bestandworst.com/r/?id=65550 >>>http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=295825 >>> >>>Or "non-partisan" means you can't vote for a Republican? >>>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1965899/posts >> >>Thanks for the links to old articles about a van having its tires slashed. > >Mike if you haven't noticed presidential election come around only once every four years. >But thank you for avoiding the my question. > >What are the Republican's strategies for suppressing democratic votes? I REALLY like to know.
See the links I posted in reply to Charles. That's a start if you really want to know.
