>>References to polling result appear to cut two ways: 1) supporting your position when your candidate is ahead 2) totally meaningless and fraught with big margins of error and bias when your candidate is behind. Maybe we should do polling about polling to resolve this?
>
>The current polls seem extremely wise and accurate ;-)
And you can take that to the bank. Oops, I confusing issues... haha
Précédent
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement