>>>>>>>>>No kidding today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read 'Vote Obama, I need the money.' I laughed.
>>>>>>>>>I got into the restaurant and again no kidding my server had on a 'Obama 08' tie, again I laughed as he had given away his political preference--just imagine the coincidence.
>>>>>>>>>When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there in
>>>>>>>>>disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to someone who I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside. The server angrily stormed from my sight.
>>>>>>>>>I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server inside as I 've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was grateful.
>>>>>>>>>At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the actual recipient needed money more.
>>>>>>>>>I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept than in practical application.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You might try this experiment yourself
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The waiter earns over 250 grand?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I guess you missed the speeches recently where 250,000 went to 200,000 and then 150,000...? It keeps going down. His original tax plan was 40,000 but that changed pretty quickly. It will be interesting to see when he is in office what the final point will be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now Bill Richardson of NM has said 120,000.00... maybe he mis-spoke. Maybe he was talking about people living in NM only.
>>>>>
>>>>>Whatever he said, it's not pertinent.
>>>>
>>>>How about Biden's 150,000.00 speech? Will I hear 75,000.00 soon.
>>>
>>>There is no greater crime than the distortion of the truth and it seems as if America is about to elect a liar.
>>
>>You got that right!
>
>Presumably when he's you Commander in Chief you'll be a bit more supportive. Otherwise I can see the Department of Homeland security having to round a few people up !

I'm not sure if he can be Commander in Chief. AFAIK Commander in Chief would require a Top Secret security classification. I don't think he can qualify for that.