>
But Al Qaeda directly attacked the U.S. Its leaders are believed to be hiding in the mountainous regions of Pakistan, with the complicity of the Pakistanis. I don't think we should attack the country or civilians. But a targeted military attack on Al Qaeda forces hiding in Pakistan is appropriate IMO.>
>see
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/may/25/usnews.france>
>Presumably a NZ attack on Virginia would be in order?
>
>;-)
I assume he can't be extradicted because he's never been charged with a crime in NZ?
Personally, I think we should expell him, but I also wouldn't cry if the Kiwis snatched him. Doesn't sound like an airstrike is necessary. Probably easier to just do an 'extraordinary rendition'. If NZ really wanted him, I think they could have him.
Charles Hankey
Though a good deal is too strange to be believed, nothing is too strange to have happened.
- Thomas Hardy
Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don't mean to do harm-- but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.
-- T. S. Eliot
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
- Ben Franklin
Pardon him, Theodotus. He is a barbarian, and thinks that the customs of his tribe and island are the laws of nature.
