Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Sort not working as expected
Message
De
12/11/2008 10:21:54
 
 
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP2
OS:
Vista
Network:
Windows 2008 Server
Database:
MS SQL Server
Divers
Thread ID:
01361158
Message ID:
01361346
Vues:
18
>>Sure
>>
>>"SQL group clause missing or invalid" under engine 90
>>
>>Now remember this was just a "first cut" stab at the SQL and I've trried many permutations, including "group by 1, 4"
>>
>>
>>Select JobAct.OurInvID, jobheads.JobID, SUM( jobheads.Quantity) as Booked, SUM( jobact.hours) as Charged, JobHeads.LabourID ;
>>  from jobact, jobheads ;
>>  where jobheads.JobID = jobact.JobID ;
>>  AND jobAct.JobID = "RTvo" ;
>>  and not EMPTY( JobAct.OurInvID) ;
>>  group by OurInvID, LabourID ;
>>  into cursor JobsS
>>
>>
>>What exactly IS VFP 9's problem with this (remember I've only been using 9 for 2 months now)
>
>This query also needs a group by jobheads.JobID. All fields which are not in aggregate function MUST be listed in GROUP BY. So, the rule is very simple: either field should be one of the aggregate functions (MIN, MAX, AVG, COUNT, SUM) or it should be in GROUP BY list of the fields.

Thanks. That's how I read it in Help but didn't think it meant you had top have ALL non-agg fields. Is this new to 8/9 cos I don't recall having to do this in the past - I thought only the fields you wanted,say, a printing group header break on?
- Whoever said that women are the weaker sex never tried to wrest the bedclothes off one in the middle of the night
- Worry is the interest you pay, in advance, for a loan that you may never need to take out.
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform