>>Matt -- Did I miss something here? I don't see a question.
>
>The quesion should have ended in a '?', but didn't sorry.. Here is the Q:
>
>

>Now then, is it also common to use those same prefixes when naming custom Methods that return known types?
>

>
>
No, it is not a common practice. The method name should describe what method does, not exactly what method returns. However, for the example above you may name this method

IsSomeObject