>>>>>>>>>As for 9/11, I did not express nothing of the sort. I expressed my doubts/questions of what does not make any sense to me. What bothers my logic even today after 7 years passed. When I cannot put peaces together that naturally rises my curiosity. When part of simple 'math problem' is 3000 lives, that makes me angry on top of it. I have no 'beliefs' in respect of 9/11, just questions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Now, if you reached some nirvana of eternal wisdom, where these simple 'math problems' are self explanatory then fine.
>>>>>>>>>Not that I am impressed with your little equilibrium (I am not) , but it does make me wander how one rich that stage.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Over & Out
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm sure they are extending the presidential terms from 4 years to 6 simply because they love democracy. :o)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>This awakens my curiosity. In these six years of France-bashing, nobody had the imagination to call them non-democratic because their presidential term is seven years. The guys have got a free pass for no good reason... except that they switched from 7 to 5 years in 2002. But then, I'm still amazed that nobody had the presence of mind to call 7 years of Valéry Giscard d'Estaing and 14 years of François Mitterand what they were - pure antidemocratic dictatorship.
>>>>>
>>>>>You're calling France a dictatorship because their presidential term is longer than ours?
>>>>
>>>>More probably because somebody called Russia a dictatorship because Putin was increasing the length of the presidential term.
>>>
>>>It would be more correct to identify Russian presidential term extension as another indication of dictatorship. I wonder if it would invoke the same French example.
>>
>>First sentence, yes. It seems unfortunate that there appears to be no way for Putin to be stopped.
>>
>>Second sentence; dunno. I'm just saying that I figured that was what Dragan was getting at.
>
>If a U.S. President had increased GDP 72%, cut poverty in half, and increased average monthly salarys by 150%,
>
>hmmmmm,
>
>I could see amendments to our constitution being considered to allow a continuation of that administration...
>
>Wouldn't happen though. Not the changes to the economy and not the change to the constitution.

Recent Onion headline: "Supreme Court Upholds Bill of Rights, 5-4" ;-)