>>And C# is not a bad language, it's just a bit too much oriented towards the apps Microsoft wants to make, but it looks flexible enough to be able to do other things just as well. But I simply don't trust Microsoft. Once there's a C# by a different vendor, and that vendor doesn't have to play catch up with M$ every few months (i.e. the specs are public and the code developed for one compiler runs the same when compiled on another), then... I may change my mind.
>

ps: C# is java like. MS took that from Sun and adapted/improved it a bit