>He's cost us far too much already. Off with his head and be done with it. If they need help doing it, give me a call.
>
>I'm sure Tamar would disagree since she wants to let all criminals go free (because there's a chance that someone might have been wrongly convicted).

Who was it who said (paraphrasing) "Better a hundred guilty men go free than one innocent man be punished..."?

But in this case, pass me the axe if you get a bit windy ...

>
>>http://www.fayobserver.com/article?id=311008
>>
>>His crimes:
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_A._Gray
>>
>>One thing unique to military executions:
>>
>>President Bush on July 28, 2008, approved the death sentence in the case of the United States v Ronald A. Gray. The Uniform Code of Military Justice specifies that only the president can give final approval to a military death sentence, Army officials said.
>>
>>Chicago Tribune Article:
>>
>>http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-ronald-a-gray-080729-ht,0,1444216.story
>>
>>Bush's decision marked the first time in 51 years that a president has affirmed a death sentence for a member of the U.S. military. It was the first time in 46 years that such a decision has even been weighed in the Oval Office.
>>
>>This article is concerning:
>>
>>http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/29-07-2008/105914-bush_ronald_gray-0
>>
>>The history of the US Army knows many incidents when courts martial brought down death sentences against military men. This was especially noticeable during the US-led campaign in Iraq. There was quite a number of incidents, when US military men were put on trial for their actions against Iraqi civilians. US peacemakers raped women and children, humiliated and tortured unarmed men.