>>Hi,
>>
>>>Are you looking for new ?
>>
>>Yes! I forgotten about that usage but as soon as I saw the line above I knew what you were suggesting!
>>
>>Should work fine. Thanks,
>>Viv
>
>
>Viv,
>
>Hear my confession. I had not forgotten about that usage - I simply didn't know about it.
>
>I tried without the new (and the stuff in the main) and whilst debugging OrderB I saw that it still had the 'old' (base) List and that the old List was hidden.
>
>In all honesty - it was the compiler that suggested the new keyword

Didn't do it for me :-{
I spent a while trying to work out why I couldn't do an explicit/implicit type conversion ......
Seems like my whole day today was taken up with either frustration because I didn't know how to do something or boredom because I did (and had to spend time doing it...)

BTW, it DID work fine.......
Thx again,
Viv