>>Unprecedented intelligence cooperation involving investigating agencies and spy outfits of India, United States, United Kingdom and Israel has got underway to crack the method and motive behind the Mumbai terrorist massacre, now widely blamed on Islamist radicals who appeared to have all four countries on their hit list when they arrived on the shores of India.
>>
>>Cooperation has been precipitated in part by the death of Americans, Britons, and Israelis, in the carnage. Thousands of Indians have died in terror attacks in India in the previous two decades without the world getting exercised about it, but the manner in which the terrorists who attacked Mumbai are reported to have singled out Americans and Britons, besides pointedly occupying a Jewish center, has revealed that their agenda was wider than just domestic discontent or the Kashmir issue.
>>
>>The British and Americans always used Pakistan to get India in trouble. Always used Kashmir as a soft target of India.
>>
>>You are the only human beings and rest of the world can die for your ugly politics.
>
>I'm suprised to see how long it took for someone to blame the US for these attacks. I'm really suprised it didn't come from one of the normal US bashers on here.

It would be nice, if people do read and understand what another writes. First of all the poster DID NOT BLAME THE US FOR ATTACKS. It does blame the international (he mentions the US, the UK and israel) world for getting involved only when it involves only a few citizens to be a victim, while there is a long history of such attacks in their country. In the last 20 years, no other other country was particulary concerned about those terroristic attacks.

I read it as the frustration of the poster as unsing these events for their own political purposes in the name of protection of their own citizens, while this would probably not have happened if there were no forreigh casulties.

>Pakistan and India have been wonderful neighbors since at least the 1960's right? Only the big bad US caused problems, right?

You're being to sensitive on anytime the US is blamed for it. Any country that pretents to have the leading role in the world politics will get critisism.. right or wrong...

Get over it.

>India would be home free if the US and Britain and the few other countries with stones enough to stand up to Islamic terrorism surrendered to the terrorists of the hour like France and Spain. Islam would be a good neighbor to India, right?

You clearly have as much knowledge about the problem as GBW had about the shiites and the soenites before he invaded iraq. You are a good republican.

Get over it.

>Who had the weapons in Mumbai? The US? How many US troops were involved?
>
>Indian forces failed miserably in handling the situation caused by Islam.

What situation.. Please get a clue... you have abosolutely no knowledge about what you're talking about. India is a huge country with over 1 billion people with lots of religions, classes, etnicities and languages. You urge to simplify this to a black and white situation of muslim vs hindi or christianity proves to be totally out of touch with reality. FYI, islam is the second religion in india (after hindi) with 138 million!! people.

>Learn to handle your own problems w/o using the US as a scapegoat.

To some extent you're right in that. However the US has a to big influence on world economics and politics to be ignored in any about country. For example, I have trouble selling my house right now, and that has absolutely nothing to do with the house market in the netherlands (which is very different from the US and the UK), but all to do with the financial crisis that was caused by (which country)??