>>>>>>Jay,
>>>>>>I don't think there's any point in arguing. Some people have a sense of entitlement that I will never understand. Maybe it's a cultural thing.
>>>>>
>>>>>You put a label on the person calling that person a twit. Why you're surprised that person may not like that label ?
>>>>
>>>>So, call it something nicer. Like "Person who I would prefer not to communicate with" - is that better? I don't care what it's called, just that it exists. You can call it the "I love butterflies" filter for all I care. Is that your issue with it?
>>>
>>>I'm on your twit filter but I know that you read my replies. And sometimes you reply to me. That's the thing I don't get.
>>>
>>>Like I said in the original message when I started this thread I don't mind being on the twit list of some developers over here. This is in no way a low self-esteem issue.
>>>
>>>I understand the principle of a twit list. But apparently you're the one that don't get it.
>>
>>If you don't want to see his replies, put him on your twit filter list. Simple. :o) The only part of the twit filter that seems to be broken is that replies from those in your twit filter still show up in the left pane under 'Reply'
>
>For Michel I guess that it would'nt be that much of a deal.
>
>

>IF user is on the reader's twit list
>   thisform.ButtonReply.enabled = .f.
>ENDIF
>

>
>Then the twit filter would seem more logic I guess.

I disagree. The twit filter is not meant (my understanding anyway) to prevent a user from replying to a thread. If you employ a twit filter it shouldn't affect anyone else - in other words, you are filtering what you see, not what people are able to post or what others may view. It is a filter which only applies to you. It shouldn't prevent anyone from replying to a thread. It should only filter what you view.