>>Perhaps the answer is to apply the twit filter only in the technical forums leaving "chatter" as a free-for-all.
>>
>>Or perhaps the other way around would be better: assuming that people keep things technical it seems inappropriate to interrupt technical contributions just because you don't like the source. Everybody may miss out or exchanges may become stilted because one person has a snitch on somebody else.
>
>Or maybe we should set up a committee to hear all twit-related complaints. With a proper system of review, rulings, and appeals, we can get this serious problem under control. It deserves no less than our full attention and commitment.
>
>Ow, my cheek hurts....
Who slapped you? Should we call a doctor? :)
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
