>Alan,
>
>No the whole "negative 1 times" subtopic is obfuscating the discussion.

Hmmm... a little bit like saying the fact that I'm old, overweight, and can't jump is obfuscating the discussion that I'm a better basketball player than Kobe Bryant. ;)

>
>Negative two squared equals positive 4 it's as plain and simple as that.
>
>Your initial reaction was correct, VFP is correct, and I happen to be correct... to heck with all the opposing naysayers. *g*
>
>>Agreed. It's not really the negative of 2 squared. It's negative 1 times 2 squared. As far as most of the people posting who say what I'm saying, the info comes from math sources (texts, professors, engineers etc.). I know it seem counter-intuitive and initially, I agreed with your view, but so far, not one legitimate math source I've seen agrees; so afaic, I was wrong, and the texts etc are right.