Was there ever a conclusion here as to what is correct?

I would of done it like this:
(-2)^2 = 4


>David,
>
>The more I think about it the more I agree with you.
>
>JimB
>>Jim,
>>
>>This has diverged so far and I've not read every message. But I have to just plain disagree with most people posting here.
>>
>>-2^2 is negative two squared.. it is not the negative of two squared.
>>
>>The sign is bound to the number.
>>
>>What would y'all say if the problem was written +2^2? It's the same thing with opposite sign, it is positive two squared, not the positive of two squared.
>>
>>>>Metin,
>>>>
>>>>> but online math calculator, my math. eng. friend and my daughter say -4... :(
>>>>
>>>>They are all wrong. The answer is 4.
>>>>
>>>>The unary negation operation has higher precedence than exponentiation.
>>>>
>>>>I order for the answer to be -4, the expression would have to be -(2**2) using parens in order to force the exponentiation to happen first.
>>>
>>>This is a very interresting discussion. I would have gone along with you on the unary operator being a higher precedence than exponentiation. However, after reading this thread adn the supporting links to the various arguments I am beginning to agree with the idea that unary sign is at the precedence evel of multiplication and division.