>>The problem with my advice to '
tell her that this twitter is a b#%$^d indeed' is that it is indeed probably too harsh (and derogating) for this person. Allow me to change my advice to
tell her that this twitter is thus behaving like a b#%$^d indeed.
>
>Problem is that until you talk to that person, and get his side of the story, you don't really even know that much.
IF that person agrees to talk with me about the case, then I might (or might not) revise my stance. And more often than not I try to get in contact. But if that other person doesn't give a s*$t and simply ignores my request, then I'm not the type of person who will stick to the opinion that I can only judge after having heard both sides. Then I'll choose side based on the one side of the story that I know of.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
