>Alan,
>
>If to you Dr. Math is the ultimate authority on all topics mathematical... well then that speaks volumes.

Sorry, but that requires a reply. Dr. Math is one of many 'authorities' that have been posted here.

>
>If you don't "read aloud" the original posting as raise negative two to the second power it's not my problem.
>
>EOT
>
>>>Alan,
>>>
>>>It takes precedence because it does. I'm not making this up. Whether or not anyone can find alternate authorities as proof doesn't matter to me. I'm not going to wade through all of the crap sources on the internet that proclaim that -2 squared is -4. They are flatly wrong.
>>
>>Seems to me that if the math authorities and the math rules show that -2^2 is -4, then yes, you are making it up. When the next space shuttle sent to the moon ends up in alpha centauri, it's going to be on your head.
>>
>>>
>>>>Ok, I get it now. The unary operator takes precedence over exponentiation because..... you want it to? I tried that philosophy out when I was in school in hopes of perfect scores on everything. Oddly, it didn't work out that way. ;)