Maybe I couldn't see the wood for the trees, but I couldn't see him and, if you read my comments to Michel re: this, the reasons are obvious ... if he WAS on my list.

I don't imagine he's twitted me cos, we've exchanged civil PMs and the last time I sent him a message it was my asked for opinion on his prospective job, so I don't see how I could have pissed him.

>I got him on the list
>
>

>33.	60649	Mike	Cole	Yellow Lab Technologies	Stanley
>

>
>Maybe he twitted you? :)
>
>
>>Salut Michel
>>
>>I tried to send a message direct to MIke Cole, using the spy glass tool.
>>
>>I said lastname = "Cole" (not in)
>>and first name =/in "Mike"
>>
>>I didn't get him in the list
>>The list included a bunch of Colmans (although I said "=")
>>The Coles and Colemans were all mixed up
>>Neither Coleman's nor Cole's first names were in alphabetical order.
>>
>>While I'm at it, considering the length of the latest epic twit filter thread it made me think:
>>
>>When one replies to a message, and gets the list of thread participants, is there any reason why it can't be in alpha order, instead of (I presume) order in which people joined the thread. Sometimes, on a huge thread like the above, it's very hard to find a name to CC via the checkbox.
>>
>>
>>Je te remercie en avance.