>Surprising:
>
>Suzuki SX4 made top marks for front and side impact.
>
>http://www.fayobserver.com/article?id=313372

In first for car crash test you should trust Euro NCAP not US NCAP. Because your limits so low than Euro NCAP. Big cars seem people more safety. But that's not true.

See just these samples. Look for which cars got Five stars:

These are big expensive cars:

http://www.euroncap.com/tests/chrysler_voyager_2007/277.aspx

http://www.euroncap.com/tests/jeep_grand_cherokee_2005/239.aspx

http://www.euroncap.com/tests/land_rover_range_rover_2002/126.aspx

You seee Grand Voyager got just one star. It's like a coffin. Range Rover and Grand cherokee got four stars. Not perfect.

But these supermini cars got five stars:

http://www.euroncap.com/tests/alfa_romeo_mito_2008/332.aspx
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/bmw_mini_2007/288.aspx
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/Fiat_500_2007/298.aspx
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/renault_clio_2005/220.aspx
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/opel_vauxhall_corsa_2006/261.aspx

You can see these giant pick-ups terrible. They seem so safetly:

http://www.euroncap.com/tests/ford_ranger_2008/342.aspx
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/isuzu_dmax_rodeo/316.aspx

Look Nissan Navara. In first test failed, can't got even one star. After an upgrade it got three stars:
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/nissan_navara/317.aspx
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/nissan_navara_2008_2/319.aspx

Everyone thinks about Volvo is the best safetly car on the world. But that's wrong. Renault's all models have five stars (My car is not a Renault). they have 8 or 9 car models. There isn't any more car could success that.