>>>>>>>>>>Uh huh, nice try. I have a bridge for sale.... cheap....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I don't understand what you were trying to say to me, but I guess it doesn't matter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You said you just found the message from Ed and just posted it without any ulterior motive. I am saying that's ridiculous, you knew exactly what you're doing when you posted it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Interesting interpretation. What she actually said was ...so I brought it up as related to the topic. The fact that the opinion on the twit filter that Ed's post expresses is diametrically opposed to Naomi's makes it it difficult for me to see why you'd be impugning her motives.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I think she did it as a way of saying, "Ok, even Ed agrees with almost everyone else regarding the Twit Filter. Since I have always had great respect for Ed, Peter and I must be wrong and I'm going to stop arguing and whining about it." I'm with John on this one; seems quite clear to me.
>>>>>
>>>>>I wish you'd ALL stop freakin whining about it.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's just a bickering match.
>>>>
>>>>But we've always been a bickering bunch ;-) Like a family in a way....
>>>
>>>No we haven't. No it isn't ...
>>>
>>>( and now,for something completely different ...)
>>
>>That's not argument, it's merely contradiction.
>
>No it's not.

Would you like to make this the longest thread the UT has ever seen?