I really like Vista. As for a memory upgrade, while I'm not saying it's right to need more memory for Vista, it shouldn't be surprising. Win95 needed more than DOS/Win3.x and XP needed more than Win9x, so a pattern was set. However, Win7 is being optimized to require less memory than Vista. The demo at PDC was done on a Netbook with 1 Gig RAM and performed very well.

>
>Vista has now been running here for several months and I am quite happy with it. It took a long time and a memory upgrade for me to reach that point, though. For sure my attitude toward new OS releases has changed. No more rushing out on the day of release to buy each one. Or getting it free for being a beta tester, back when there was no such thing as a "marketing beta." (Now there is a sorcerer's phrase!) "In a while" is soon enough now.