>We use optimistic table buffering. At least I think that's what's being use for this. Anyway, it seems that somewhere in our code something is happening where the locking is not working right. We are not sure where yet, but it looks like we have a valid Record-level lock, but another user can change the same record. What are some of the things we can look for? I was wondering if it was flushing (where is Jim when you need him?) but don't know enough about that. Any guidance appreciated.

Jay,

Can you explain what exactly you're observing? Some code may be helpful as well.