>>>>>>>and nobody at all being allowed to through no decision of their own.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't understand this part, also I mentioned the other case which was very similar to Kevin's case (I don't talk about the twit, I'm talking about a ban here).
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh, sorry. I don't know anything about your ban on the other site, so I'm spectacularly unqualified to comment.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Does hacking into somebody's user account in order to read posts ring a bell?
>>>
>>>John, if the password is simple to guess it's not hacking - it's being a victim!
>>
>>Funny you say that. I was waiting outside a church a few weeks ago and needed internet access. I found the church's signal, but it had security on it. The first thing I tried worked; Jesus. No, that was the password. Jesus. How incredibly simplistic. They could have at least used Esau or something. Would have only taken me a half-hour, but at least it would have felt I sort of earned it.
>
>They should have used Jehovah, but make it begin with an I like on Indiana Jones.

Crap. I would have fallen through the stones!