>>>I must be forgetting the entire past today. I don't remember you denying it, only that you felt justified in doing it.
>>
>>The original ban was unjust. I'm not talking about the consequnces of it.
>
>
>Unjust in you eyes, but entirely just in the eyes of the moderators and most of the others users of that forum that complained. You don't have a RIGHT to exist in a forum you have the privelege to use it as the owners see fit. Its like a right to work state, they don't need a reason to let you go, they can fire you at will. Same thing. Grow up and learn that the world doesn't resolve around you or your wants.

Right, but the point is - if that's the case, then the decision to ban Kevin is also just in the eyes of the moderators. We don't know how many UT users complained.

In other words, it's the same thing and if we apply the rule to the moderators of foxite, we need to apply the same rule to Kevin's case as well.

Using exactly your words, Kevin didn't have a RIGHT to exist in a forum, he had a privilege that was taken out.

Exactly the same thing and should be treated fairly (the same) in both cases.