>>>>>>>and nobody at all being allowed to through no decision of their own.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't understand this part, also I mentioned the other case which was very similar to Kevin's case (I don't talk about the twit, I'm talking about a ban here).
>>>>>
>>>>>Naomi, let the subject freaking die. Get over it. Holy crap this is obnoxious. You wonder why people twit you??? It's because of stupid crap like this. GET OVER IT!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>>I twit you because I don't want to hear from you. Kevin is banned so nobody can hear from him. Do you seriously not get the difference there, or do you just look for opportunities to whine?
>>>>>
>>>>>Get over it.
>>>>
>>>>If you twitted her why are you replying ?
>>>
>>>Because he can. Just because he doesn't want to normally see her crap doesn't mean that he can't reply to some he does. What's your issue with him wanting to reply? He could Twit Nadya Monday, Wedensday and Friday, but not the other days. Who cares his reasons for it other than him?
>>
>>Because if you want to ignore someone then ignore them don't keep jumping in and out. Get a grip.
>
>That's where you get confused. It's none of our business what someone else does regarding Twitting. If he wants to jump in and out? Big. Friggin. Deal. Who cares? Why do you think you are the keeper of the what someone should or shouldn't do? Let him do what he wants.

And I'm doing what I want and saying what I think .You seem to find that annoying and that is very much your problem.