>>>>I must be forgetting the entire past today. I don't remember you denying it, only that you felt justified in doing it.
>>>
>>>The original ban was unjust. I'm not talking about the consequnces of it.
>>
>>
>>Unjust in you eyes, but entirely just in the eyes of the moderators and most of the others users of that forum that complained. You don't have a RIGHT to exist in a forum you have the privelege to use it as the owners see fit. Its like a right to work state, they don't need a reason to let you go, they can fire you at will. Same thing. Grow up and learn that the world doesn't resolve around you or your wants.
>
>Right, but the point is - if that's the case, then the decision to ban Kevin is also just in the eyes of the moderators. We don't know how many UT users complained.
>
>In other words, it's the same thing and if we apply the rule to the moderators of foxite, we need to apply the same rule to Kevin's case as well.
>
>Using exactly your words, Kevin didn't have a RIGHT to exist in a forum, he had a privilege that was taken out.
>
>Exactly the same thing and should be treated fairly (the same) in both cases.

What you mean "we," Kemosabe? ;-) We don't make the rules or enforce them. The forum moderator does. Anyone who is too bothered by the rules is always free to go elsewhere.