>>>>If you can't tell that is stalking, then I maybe I'll ask you again after the court case.
>>>
>>>Communicating in the technical forum is different.
>>
>>Like hell it is. I'm surprised MF hasn't said something to you already about it. The last thing he needs is to be on some blog somewhere where they are discussing the stalker on UT. How can you not understand that you are overstepping boundaries in a very large way if someone does not want to communicate with you and you still persist?
>>
>>One definition of stalker: Someone who intrudes on the privacy or property of another without permission.
>>
>>How many people have to tell you to stop before you do? Are you really that incredibly damaged that you don't get this?
>
>Although I can't really gather much in Naomi's defence (she brought this uppon herself mainly by herself) ,
>what you guys are doing is beyond every sence of human deacency and bordering on mental cruelty.

Ask Mike C what is mental cruelty.

>Especially your posts. Why are YOU involved in all this so energetically ??? It is between her and MikeC.
>Looks to me that you take particular pleasure in beating her down to her own mental oblivion.

Because she hears nothing unless you do it hard. If she would just friggin stop going on about it, it would die. I'm hoping that at some point she gets it and stops.

>She is a obviosely complex personality that have her own share of problems, but how does that
>warrants for this obvious hostility by you (and few other jewells here) is beyond my comprehension.

Complex? That's very nice of you. Just like I have the right to say what I want, so do you.

>This is just public forum, but you do know Nadia then Naomi for minimum 10 years. Would you do this to someone who you know
>10 years in real life ??

Yes, if they needed it. And have.

>Knock it off !

Yeah, that's effective. No.