>>>>>>>>>>>Naomi is the person that keeps bringing this issue public.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>And yet y'all are the ones continuing the discussion for DAYS, aren't you? a wee bit enabling, perhaps?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Or do I just need to stop the "She started it!" whinging with "if Naomi whines in the woods and no one is there to comment on it, has she really?"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Just. Stop. The. Responses.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Excellent point, Dorris
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Looks like you didn't understand. Dorris said to stop the responses 8-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Oh yes I did understand it Denis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>- They continue discussing it for days and hence should stop discussing (or answering)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe it's a language difference, but Denis's response was a joke
>>>>>>
>>>>>>If you understood it and thought it was an excellent point.........
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why did you post a response??????
>>>>>Right
>>>>
>>>>I am posting a repsonse because I agree that we should not post repsonses. I hope everyone agrees that we should not repsond.
>>>
>>>One "repsonse" is a typo - two is a coincidence - but a following "repsond" is sheer carelessness :-)
>>
>>Naw, this is just so we know it was really Jim posting and not someone who had hacked his account.
>
>Ooooh, Mieaow!

Mike and I go way back on the fact that my brain moves faster than my fingers.