>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Naomi is the person that keeps bringing this issue public.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>And yet y'all are the ones continuing the discussion for DAYS, aren't you? a wee bit enabling, perhaps?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or do I just need to stop the "She started it!" whinging with "if Naomi whines in the woods and no one is there to comment on it, has she really?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Just. Stop. The. Responses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Excellent point, Dorris
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Looks like you didn't understand. Dorris said to stop the responses 8-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Oh yes I did understand it Denis
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>- They continue discussing it for days and hence should stop discussing (or answering)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Maybe it's a language difference, but Denis's response was a joke
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If you understood it and thought it was an excellent point.........
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why did you post a response??????
>>>>>>>>Right
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I am posting a repsonse because I agree that we should not post repsonses. I hope everyone agrees that we should not repsond.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>One "repsonse" is a typo - two is a coincidence - but a following "repsond" is sheer carelessness :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>Naw, this is just so we know it was really Jim posting and not someone who had hacked his account.
>>>>
>>>>Ooooh, Mieaow!
>>>
>>>Mike and I go way back on the fact that my brain moves faster than my fingers.
>>
>>You must have spell checked that sentence, didn't you? ;-)
>
>... mustn't you.

No further questions. Your witness.