>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Naomi is the person that keeps bringing this issue public.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>And yet y'all are the ones continuing the discussion for DAYS, aren't you? a wee bit enabling, perhaps?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Or do I just need to stop the "She started it!" whinging with "if Naomi whines in the woods and no one is there to comment on it, has she really?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Just. Stop. The. Responses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Excellent point, Dorris
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Looks like you didn't understand. Dorris said to stop the responses 8-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh yes I did understand it Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>- They continue discussing it for days and hence should stop discussing (or answering)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Maybe it's a language difference, but Denis's response was a joke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you understood it and thought it was an excellent point.........
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Why did you post a response??????
>>>>>>>>>>>>Right
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I am posting a repsonse because I agree that we should not post repsonses. I hope everyone agrees that we should not repsond.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>One "repsonse" is a typo - two is a coincidence - but a following "repsond" is sheer carelessness :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Naw, this is just so we know it was really Jim posting and not someone who had hacked his account.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Ooooh, Mieaow!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mike and I go way back on the fact that my brain moves faster than my fingers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I thought that was another poke at Naomi.
>>>>>
>>>>>That was probably gratuitous at the end and could have been left out. My joke was that I have been reading Jim's messages with transposed letters since Hitler was a corporal.
>>>>
>>>>I understood that bit, but the scratch was gratuitous.
>>>>
>>>>Either that, I assumed, or Jim's accent is one where one "akses as question" (like the Egyptians refer to "the Sphynkes" and stand on "balocnies")
>>>
>>>And George talks about nucular weapons or borrowing books from the liberry.
>>
>>And his fellow pubic wigs!
>
>Do not forget that nonmunation is nonmunation and nothing more.

how can I forget the meaning of a word that doesn't exist?