>>>>>>>>>>I think the twit filter should hide every message where the twitted person is involved, either as orginal poster or recipient of another post.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I think that there should not be a twit filter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>How much did Naomi pay you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There should be a twat filter for those who write about the twit filter!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, let's hold hands and sing together ...
>>>>>
>>>>>You do realise that "twat" wasn't a typo, and has maybe a different meaning in Brit-Eng?
>>>>
>>>>Didn't think it was a typo.
>>>>
>>>>If it means the same thing on your side of the pond that it does on my side...........my personal opinion is that it is (ummmmm) inappropriate.
>>>
>>>Aside what i think the common meaning is, over here it also means like a "super twit", an @asshole, jerk, etc.
>>
>>Disregard my post just now on this topic. I see it has already been, uh, covered.
>
>Seems a twat filter wouldn't exactly prohibit interaction but might mean you'd strain something in attempting social intercourse.

You're on your own here, buddy ;-)