>>>Exclude words may be a good option, but I'm afraid it would be harder to implement than new type of search (Only threads started). However, I don't know, may be both of these options are quite hard to implement based on the current database structure.
>>
>>I'd say excluded words should be pretty simple to do. Instead of "for xxx $ yyy", "for !(xxx $ yyy)" or instead of "where xxx in (yyy)", "where xxx not in (yyy)".
>
>I don't know for sure, but I believe Michel used PHDBase library for the search on this site. That's why I'm not sure how easy is to implement exclude option.
Ah. Ok, I've never used it, and so I can't comment on how difficult or easy it might be to retrofit using it.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only