>That is precisely my point. We do not have rules to follow at this point in time.

We have rules. They're just not perfect. Is the solution to ignore them (by saying, for example, that many of them have no basis, which I think is unfair), or to follow them, and by so doing, improve them through practice?

>Face it, if architect delivered their work with our QA, our cities would look like Beyrouth in 1975, doctors would be criminals, lawyers (although I have a doubt about them:)) and accountants would only rarely be seen outside of prisons.

You're right. :) Which is typical of a very young industry. This says to me that we need as many useful rules as we can get.