>>if clinton didn't obstruct justice at every turn, this would have cost much less (and probably be done before ms. lewinsky's lips entered the story)
>
>You, like others, are not addressing the point I raised, which is why we should have spent a single thin dime to find out what we already knew?

what, that he can't be trusted any further than we can throw him?

he's still innocent til proven guilty, so we'd have to prove what we already know.