>I received a nasty email from JVP quoting a message I'd posted here. It was in the same timeframe as all this was happening, so I put 2 and 2 together and, apparently, came up with 5.
>
>Do the world a favor and dispense with all the qualifiers....like "apparently". You were wrong.
>
>Of course, I could play the same game, and "speculate" with this "single point of data" on whether your running to Michel might have contributed to my banishment. After all, it's been "speculated" that Michel may have jumped the gun and banned me on so-called "hard data".

You could, but since I didn't go to Michel about it (because I didn't even have the thought until you were banned), you'd be wrong.

Tamar