Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
So - what was the reason?
Message
From
14/01/2009 14:59:38
Walter Meester
HoogkarspelNetherlands
 
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01373434
Message ID:
01373690
Views:
23
>Damn... let it go man... I'd like to know why you were banned as well as many other people up here, but if the only reason to get back here is to troll and irritate people, I'd rather see you go again.
>
>Let it go and contribute something to the community up here. You won't gain anything by acting like an ass.

>
>Let me get this right...
>
>You and I were having a technical point-counterpoint on database development and SQL programming. I doubt we'll ever see eye-to-eye, which is fine, but at least others were gaining insights from BOTH of us. And I certainly don't mind continuing it....
>
>Fournier bans me, right when things were getting pretty interesting with our exchanges. Do you think he had the community at heart? No explanation, no warning, he just tagged and bagged me.

Let me get this straight. It came as a full surprise to me. I have absolutely no knowledge on what happened or on what 'evidence' michel based your ban upon. I was dissapointed we were not able to continue our discussion. However I had absolutely no part in this so I can't make any judgement

>A few chose to celebrate....no more exchanges between you and myself that could have further benefited people (as well as ourselves)....and some public speculation that I might have been JVP....and only murky replies from Fournier that kept the door of suspicion open.
>
>...and you're saying that I'm acting like an ass??????

Only when you continue to live in the past to go beating a dead horse... let it go.

>Well, I wasn't JVP, and I honestly don't know what rule I broke. Fournier has already demonstrated his views on when he himself wants an explanation (last fall with MVP and UT relationships)....so given the speculation last spring, I goddamn well deserve an explanation, and I think others do as well.

Personally I think you're right you need to be given an explanation, but again, I'm no party in this matter.

>I haven't changed one bit. I'm going to keep this up until Forunier replies, or bans me again. I'd rather have him be a man and say he made a mistake. There's been speculation that I might take some kind of action, and that's why MF won't say a word. Let me say this now...I hate about 99% of lawyers, and I have zero interest in any action - other than hearing the truth.

I see no benefit to do this publically. This will not gain you anything. At least no sympathy from the rest of the community. I don't think you will be able to get any response as long as you try to irritate/discredit michel publically. He will just ignore you.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform