> You could, but since I didn't go to Michel about it (because I didn't even have the thought until you were banned), you'd be wrong.
>
>Hmmm....well, let me ask this.
>
>In Message #1300974, about 2 days after I'd been banned, when asked if you'd "reported" anything to the UT, you stated the following:
>
>"Not that it's any of your business, but when this happened several weeks ago, I let Michel know only that JVP had some source of access to some UT content. I did not mention anyone else in my note, or suggest that any individual was involved. As I said, this happened in the middle of the "bring JVP back" thread and I considered it relevant for Michel's decision-making."
>
>Do you find both things consistent?

You're right. I'd forgotten that I told Michel about the e-mail. (It was quite a while ago.) I did not, however, mention your name or anyone else's other than JVP.

I just dug up the message I sent to Michel. If, as someone here said, you were banned in March, then it was sent about a month earlier (during the discussions about reinstatement). It also pointed out that the message of mine that he quoted was _not_ from one of the threads about him, but on a totally unrelated subject in Chatter. For that reason, I didn't think someone had sent him my message. I couldn't see why anyone would.

I never said anything to Michel about you in that message or any other.

Tamar