>>>Hey, Mike,
>>>
>>>I'm not a fan of Bush....but under his Administration, American soil has remained unattacked after 9/11. We will never know what would have occured.
>>
>>But, aside from Clinton, US soil had not been attacked TILL his administration!
>
>Pearl Harbor. Did the sterling democrat FDR get any criticism for that?

Oh, of course. But that is 100s miles away from mainland USA.
I don't blame Bush for 9/11 BUT to say that USA not attacked since his admin. can equally say wasn't before (that much) and worst & most costly attack of all "on his watch"

>
>If Bush gets blamed for allowing 9/11 to happen, he should at least get the credit for not letting it happen again.

Like the sentry who falls asleep on duty, balled out by his sgt, won't let it happen again?

>
>>
>>>
>>>At least we're fighting the war on terror over there (more or less at the source), instead of on our own soil.
>>>
>>>In this regard, the president is like an I.T. manager - blamed for what goes wrong, but doesn't get credit when nothing happens (where "nothing" = good)