>>>>>Hey, Mike,
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm not a fan of Bush....but under his Administration, American soil has remained unattacked after 9/11. We will never know what would have occured.
>>>>
>>>>But, aside from Clinton, US soil had not been attacked TILL his administration!
>>>
>>>Pearl Harbor. Did the sterling democrat FDR get any criticism for that?
>>
>>Actually, he did. As did the General Staff of the Army and Navy, especially the Intelligence sections. In fact, the Admiral in command of the base at Pearl got 'fired'. Really, before you go slinging glasses in your rock house, do some reading first.
>
>Actually, it was a question.

"Did FDR get an criticism for that?" is a question.

"Did the sterling democrat FDR get any criticism for that?" is a rhetorical question where the answer is that he didn't, because he was such a "sterling democrat"



>
>>>If Bush gets blamed for allowing 9/11 to happen, he should at least get the credit for not letting it happen again.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>At least we're fighting the war on terror over there (more or less at the source), instead of on our own soil.
>>>>>
>>>>>In this regard, the president is like an I.T. manager - blamed for what goes wrong, but doesn't get credit when nothing happens (where "nothing" = good)