>>You are wayyyyyyy off-base
>
>Seems that way to me. One would think that after being banned you'd come back and keep your head down. But no, you insist on keeping this pointless thread going and yourself high profile. The first thing you do is start a row. Talk about raking over the coals! You just will not let it lie. I guess the reason why Mike said leave it, when you cited a message for Tamar to "take a crack at" is that he assumed, as I did, it was another of your "proofs" of her supposed perfidy. That he couldn't be bothered to follow the link should indicate how boring the thread's become. Personally I'm sick of logging on to the UT in the mornings and being presented with yet another zig-zag of Kevin Goff ankle biting.
>
>Don't get me wrong, Kevin. I like you well enough but give it a rest, mate, eh?
>
>I look forward to your next "nuke 'em" provocation.

I think you are wrong in attacking Kevin. He deserves the answer as to why and for what reason he was banned. I am sure it was humiliating. I believe that Michel should come out publicly and either state the reasons he banned Kevin or admit a mistake and apologize. I am pretty sure that Kevin Goff would then be happy to drop the subject completely.