I don't agree that Persons B-Z will necessary follow Person A. I may be overoptimistic, but I like to think that each person is capable of making their own decisions.

Again, I'm not talking about getting the familly new cells phones, swimming pool and cars. I'm talking about the child getting enough to eat, to have acces to health care and education. That's all. The kid doesn't have to pay the price for the irresponsibility of his parents. He didn't have a word to say on this. He's a little like Persons B-Z in your exemple.

>No, the point is to display a sense of entitlement. Person A feels entitled to having a child even though Person A can't possibly afford to raise one responsibly. Person A feels than Persons B-Z should foot the bill. This sets a precedence where Person B and C see that it worked out for Person A, so now they want to have children on the same stupid Liberal "entitled to do whatever you want and other people will pay for it" plan.
>
>Meanwhile, Mike, Marcia, and William are working their tails off to have a good and enjoyable life. It's too bad that they have to pay for all of these children that should not have been created in the first place.