>>>>I'm not talking about anecdotal evidence. I'm talking about real evidence, collected by observing a large enough sample set to be meaningful.
>>>>
>>>>Tamar
>>>
>>>So now you're all about hard evidence instead of suggestions and innuendo.
>>
>>Pot, you might want to check your color
>
>Example?
Given that a lot of the "kevin goff has been banned discussion" was slinging rocks and stones at Tamar's supposed "assumptions from suggestions and innuendo" and that you seem to be going from "assumptions, suggestions and innuendo" about Tamar's supposed "assumptions, suggestions and innuendo" enough to be slinging rocks and stones at her wanting you to cite something beyond anecdotal evidence that you seem to be baseing your statements on.

Seems like the pot calling the kettle black