>>>Basically, a person can either agree or disagree with an opponent, and/or try to explain positions; but brushing aside an opinion by pretense of "links" is not the best discourse.
>>
>>But opinions weren't the issue when I asked for cites. People asserted that there are a significant number of people gaming the welfare system. I acknowledged that such people exist, but asked for some evidence that it's a large enough percentage to warrant distrusting all who are on welfare or changing the system. No one has offered any such evidence, just anecdotes. As you know, the plural of anecdote is not data.
>>
>>Tamar
>
>I just gave you an article about welfare fraud in California.
>it's not the number of people "gaming" that really matters. It's the dollars. Experts estimate about 300 BILLION dollars per year in US are given to those that are "gaming" welfare. 3billion just in California.

That seems an awfull lot, Have any hard data on that? That would mean approx 8 thousand dollar per year per citizen. I find that a bit hard to believe. What's the definition of "gaming" anyways. I don't remember the US as a place where unemployment fees where very high.