Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
What kind of president will Obama be?
Message
De
21/01/2009 13:47:37
 
 
À
21/01/2009 09:05:44
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01374786
Message ID:
01375985
Vues:
27
>>>>What I'm asking you and others for is some real evidence, not anecdotes, that the number of people who are abusing the welfare system is a significant percentage of the number of people receiving assistance. Of course, there are some cheats (as there are in pretty much any system), but the question is whether they are a large enough subset as to render the whole program invalid.
>>>>
>>>>Tamar
>>>
>>>
>>>http://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/fraud/PG270.htm
>>>
>>>Just in California for 2007-2008.
>>
>>Still anecdotes. How about offering numbers? percentages?
>>
>>Frankly, if that's all California has for 2007-08, even if we acknowledge that it's only the ones they caught, it's a pretty small set. How many people live in California? How many receive welfare?
>>
>>Tamar
>
>Are you well?
>Did you even read the article?

What article? The link you posted is titled "Welfare Fraud Stories" and documents about a dozen specific episodes. Maybe that wasn't the link you meant to post?

>California has big financial probelms and that all you can say? You think these are small numbers?
>
>"While exact figures are difficult to tally, experts estimate as much as $300 billion a year is lost to health care fraud in the United States "
>
>"$34 billion annually to provide care for about 7 million indigent Californians - with about $3 billion of that lost to fraud, experts say.."

Okay, now I see this there. Since the page appeared to be just anecdotes, I skimmed it originally. Of course, even this item just quotes unnamed "experts." It'd be nice to know who they are and where they came up with that number.

Yeah, 10% of expenditure in fraud is on the high side. It still doesn't answer the question as to what percent of _recipients_ are cheating, which was the question I asked.

It also says most of the fraud is organized crime, not the so-called "no-hopers" we've been talking about in this thread. I'm in favor of going after organized crime aggressively.

Tamar
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform