>>Well if it insists on the size... it could chop it or squeeze it. With GDI+ it's ten lines of code. Size limitation is common on many websites, no problem there, but sizing it to the exact 320x240 is a bit cumbersome. It would be nice if UT would allow for larger pictures but show these reduced with a "click to enlarge" (when they'd open in a new tab). Which is why I mention next iteration.
>>
>
>I don't see where 320x240 requirement is posted. The Upload section only listed 200k limit.
>Anyway it can be easily fixed by not displaying image in the message at all. See message #1376249

Michel is fast. Limitation is gone :).