>>>The fact that a small group is cheating big time certainly deserves attention and, in fact, if I were in charge, that would be the main focus of my enforcement efforts. If you can go after a few people and clean up a large percentage of the problem, that's far more cost-effective than going after a lot of people who are responsible for small portions.
>>>
>
>>
>>I think they should go after all cheaters. The people they hurt the most are the ones who really need the money.
>>"For every cockroach you see, there are probably a 1000 you don't see." :)
>
>It's a question of cost-efficiency. How much does it cost to document one case well enough to prosecute? That said, I think a strong enforcement effort against some of the big cheaters would discourage some people from cheating.
>

catch one small cheater, it may lead you to a big cheater....
Lets just hope Obama meant what he promised about not "business as usual".

But see if the government ever found a way to save our tax money, they wouldn't need to ask us for more of our money... they can't let that happen. They ask, and some of us are welling to give, no questions asked.

>Tamar