>>>When will people get it that these are enemy combatants, not suspects?
>>
>>As long as there is no trial, they are suspect.
>
>Wrongola. They are only suspects when the police make an arrest. This is military.
I don't see why it should make a difference whether the arrest would be made by police, military, or a private citizen. The difference between a suspect and a convicted criminal is in the proof, in the trial. And so far, as far as I know, no such proof has been given.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
