>>Now I am disagreeing again. Jay has every right to filter which messages he views if the forum allows it; however, he should not be allowed to determine whether or not someone can post a message. A filter should only prevent viewing of messages, not posting.
>>
>Tracy, that's exactly what I'm saying. The filter should not prevent me from posting.
>
>>Still, even implemented as it is now, it does not violate freedom of speech.
>
>I can not post a message, so my right to post is violated.
There is no 'right to post.' I think that is what you are not understanding. I agree that the twit filter should not be implemented the way it is now, but that is only my opinion. There is no 'right.'
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
