>>>>>I think this should be a configurable option. In other words, I don't think it's a correct behavior to be restricted in posting messages depending on other person's will. But if this is the behavior Denis wants, he may have it as an option. For myself I would prefer the original behavior without any restrictions.
>>>>
>>>>It's not what I wanted but it's better than nothing. To accomplish what I wanted (with the way the twit filter is implemented right now) I'd have to go against my principle and put Jay on my twit filter. At least that way I'd be able to help him really understand how the twit filter should work.
>>>
>>>Jay has no right to dictate how you should behave and restrict your right to reply to him.
>>
>>Jay has nothing to do with that. It's Michel that implemented this partially. Then again not sure if jay is a paying member. I'm not. That could explain things ;-)
>>
>>If the twit filter was fully implemented I wouldn't have to delete his replies ;-)
>
>So twit him.

I thought only PUTM could do it. Sergey told me I could. Done deal.